Introduction
Known to the world already on purpose, Meta and owner Mark Zuckerberg who, in truth, is socially awkward, thus, cynical, is yet again on a landmark process of doing his grand plot of pushing yet another “predictably ungodly” digital product to our faces: Metaverse VR. Despite that in these years, he has shown pathologic enjoyment at tricking online users to use his online interfaces for that rabbithole of “caching” our private information and abusing access to it.
But as always, it is, again, not about going out of oneself to serve humanity that, in parallel, is fairly compensated at the same time, but, again, in his reckless efforts just to use us all with state-of-the-art psycho-manipulative tools. And unlike platforms devoted to giving the floor to and giving means of income to certain forms of talents.
“If great people lurk as employees of Facebook, then someone in there should have already thought of including fulfilling features such as profile-blur in public visibility of accounts of PWDs as protected account and indicators of identification thereof, et cetera.”
Section 1
Come to think of it, Zuckerberg and Facebook had never cared to incentivize writers who keep certain types of users on their platform. He was just all about the media because, among other things he selfishly uses as advantage, he is always about that P.R. endeavor and abusing it. He loves being the media itself and—associated with it—attention to what subtle rabbithole he plots constantly to trick us into relinquishing our data.
One instance of his obsession with public relations to glorify his wrongdoings is when he donated to charities, e.g., $100M Newark, N.J., public schools in 2010 and $500M to Silicon Valley Community Foundation to support health and education causes—which he bragged on post that recorded over 190,000 misguided likes at the time—while he had issue regarding anti-trust competition whistleblowers coming out as well as news coming out that Facebook-owned Instagram had at the time changed it's terms of service that appear to allow the photo-sharing site to put users’ pictures in advertisements.
This goes side-by-side with his ludacris, attention-seeking marketing to hype up some new features to shove to our faces the perception of how great it is and may potentially be (and of course that renown’s credibility is nullified by the kind of reputation Zuckerberg has deep down); why the need to always broadcast and be loud about such things as doing charity? Had he been doing so for a long time already to prove his commitment to humanitarian endeavors? Like how he did psycho-analytic testing on users—comparable to what classic authoritarians would do; in fact like a modern-day Stalin. He wants us all to fall into a state of reductionism of seeing only the present and have blind spots over his foul deeds, motives and intentions. Just compare to such other entities as Google which is quiet on keeping inclusivity. (One example is Google’s portal for disability inclusion.) Unike what Facebook and Zuckerberg’s been up to, they are not shoving it in our faces how humanitarian they are.
Section 2
Counterpart in ordinary civilians of Mark Zuckerberg and if Facebook/Meta is a natural person would be somebody who’s recklessly striving for relevance despite proving to be untrustworthy and not being ashamed of those well-known facts about him.
These are people who despite continuing to do reckless assaults that alienate other’s rights and security—among other things, our data privacy on his data brokerage auctioning of our profiled identifications, and freedom of speech and of expression on his censorship—though clearly known already but, shamelessly, still wanna rush forward pushing in our faces next big things they’re up to next or at the moments which they hype up or want overrated about themselves on what undertaking resembles something of greatness, that is, if associated with prudent people to whom Zuckerberg doesn’t belong to.
Section 3
It ain’t easy to be a successful writer.
To begin with, social processes are likely existing in a would-be writer’s life needing expression, and that pushes one to be a writer in the first place. But then such sites as Facebook adds to the struggles by their out-of-touch employees and up their corporate ladder and Zucc himself—social processes exist that serve as social barriers that both accommodates and keeps away certain types of people of certain character types (having to do with immediately perceptible character like being out-of-touch) from gaining a company’s system, i.e., company culture, as a social unit.
Just see backer system inside Facebook as regards what and from whom videos they monetize. That is indicative of what types of people are employed inside Facebook previously and up to present—not being conservative in disabling profiles like some parallel government that is authoritarian. In fact, exponentially more innocent accounts had been being disabled than those really from nefarious actors in the internet; from statistics and record of type of their decision process why on earth more innocent accounts are ones disabled way more than clandestine ones, we can infer what type of people have flocked to be employed at Facebook.
This is reason why it is better that no more accounts, even of bad actors, should anymore be disabled on Facebook; we online users can govern ourselves in truth. If great people lurk as employees of Facebook, then someone in there should have already thought of including fulfilling features such as profile-blur in public visibility of accounts of PWDs as protected account and indicators of identification thereof, et cetera. But instead what we get from Facebook team is being tested psycho-analytically as if they’re psychology or cultural studies researchers following Code of Ethics of the field’s applied principles, e.g., the site being set to hide visibility of certain words like those that incite anger (very effective on people who easily get influenced, why many in public life had shifted over time to be ballistic and extremists than conventional-transitional nature—what Zuckerberg's been up to regarding this classified internal project at Facebook is exactly similar to how Stalin wanted to manipulate Russian population during his time and is the same thing that Stalin would have done if humanity already had social media back then; also why Zuckerberg, Facebook and Meta had been an enterprise that entitled itself to become like some parallel government), and other sinister doings, e.g., selling our data to third-parties. Man, if you are doing such thing, why also be authoritarian in censoring certain stuff on the platform at the same time?
Those two things alone done at the same time notwithstanding his other bossy doings, isn’t that too much already?
Section 4
Special mention, mind you, is also the fact that on the other hand they monetize pages that are, at best, only spreading videos that fool viewers in what they promise in the title but, by manipulation, only hook the audience for something they either won't deliver at all or poorly yield—and making people brain-dead. What this reflects from pool of content moderators and and their development team and Zucc himself only means being enablers of these blah, their views and interests being a friend of cause of these narcissistic people who’re short on having personality and not standing up for something great but then wants their non-merit monetized!
Think. What type of people could enablers of these narcissistic wannabes be?
Section 5
Many small thinkers write on the platform and are part of what keeps users on the site—besides mainstream-media for remaining frequenters for updating themselves about news on, still, a lot of demographics.
A site as worse as Facebook has no concern for representing some decent degree of system of merits just play around with programming code, have to maintain the site’s cybersecurity, (gradually) release updates every now and then. And that’s all of it for platforms as worse as Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook and Meta.
It’s easy money just building one thing that anybody can have idea about on what looks good and not because anybody can canvass different websites’ look-and-feel by being online and gain from those then, after developing the platform, would just be maintaining it’s cybersecurity and facility and some incremental updates being just the operations cost while milking the users, but having nothing to do with the actual process of exerting grueling effort of creating content on the platform, while those who doquality contents that keep users in the platform are uncompensated for their work and part in maintaining why users remain on the site.
Section 6
There are still many who’se legacy are warehoused in it; realistically-speaking, a lot would still be reluctant over deleting of their own data that may be some set of really precious contents that may reflect a lot of or some years of immersing and connecting with others virtually? Therefore, it is recommended that Facebook should just be a mere plug-in and not what now de-legitimized monopoly Mark Zuckerberg continually wants it to be.
He, not certainly still a human, rendered himself's itself (I don’t know how to put more accurately what Zuckerberg certainly is) to only deserve being so. “When Mark Zuckerberg wants something, it sure is certain to be a bad thing.” Indeed.
This protest against Facebook, Meta and Zuckerberg, and recommendation to (online) communities is diametrically opposite of what norms pushed is reflected his algorithm’s inner workings as regards intently punishing of sharing external links by decreasing visibility: he wants people to be stuck and isolated in Facebook as compared to when it’s just used as a plug-in that only supplements participation of laymen in the comments like what other sitar’ been doing.
In relation to section above on anarchic policy of video monetization on Facebook and in argument above on Facebook to be only a plug-in, many sites are better at incorporating means of income from videos than Facebook does with what it has done to dumb down viewers, likewise—and more importantly, as the writers’ sector throughout the world is exponentially undervalued than video content creation, thus needing more attention—many sites are more competent in being receptacles of written content than is Facebook, which only neglects contribution of those who share original thoughts and ideas—whether small, with large following, or only listened to albeit almost having no vocal participation but nevertheless still sought to be read—nor helped by the algorithm, even artificially suppressed.
This is how Mark Zuckerberg is colossally insulting the writing industry and he needs to be stopped; if Steve Jobs was ejected out of his own company, Apple, when corporate health got ugly before, Zuckerberg could and should be too. Only that the former was a virtuous soul while the latter’s stink to high heavens; the former is renowned while you cannot renown the latter for something responsible and virtuous. He’s in truth a modern-day Stalin and Ivan The Terrible.
Section 7
Mark Zucc already have been extorting us (especially psycho-analytically with internal projects to diabolically tweak the Facebook algorithm) to isolate us into his benevolently curated platform and dumb down people online into mindlessly doodling at scrolls upon scrolls of just algorithm-tampered set of feeds visible to each one of us and mindlessly staring at senseless videos they monetize by choice (also the beta-version upon beta-version push of differing tactics to manipulatively lure us to the site, like the odd notifications on random contents we have no additional time to subscribe to because Zuckerberg’s Facebook has already machinated ways to artificially devour our attention and time to begin with, thus pulling away from writers’ chances of getting their ideas seen, especially with videos and algorithm-selected polarizing feeds that their internally-memo-ed testing had proven to make people hang-out more on Zucc’s site underlying diabolic workings. What other thing does Zuckerberg and Facebook imply in wanting to suggest to us more and more random things to subscribe to from notifications than sending a manipulative message to nnnn; an aimlessly fired barrage of random arrays of what to like, follow or subscribe to in addition to nothing among what you maybe following already to some degree.
Of course, maybe you’d get hooked with what they blow to our faces—and they wish they could bombard us more with. When another additional thing gets you hooked on the platform, additional thing to follow, thus more time kept being obsessed in chasing the errands or whereabouts of yet another additional figure or influencer than such being from organic growth, not alienation on steroids via tweaking the algorithm.
Such notifications and other psycho-analytic devices used by Facebook aren’t made to help the users but to manipulate us, just like how Mark uses linguistic devices to manipulate our impression of him, of Meta and of his upcoming Metaverse by deceptive rhetorics. You may not have encountered such on your notifications, but others are experimented on for it.
That’s the point. Zucc’s Meta wants users having no idea what they’re doing so that speaking out may be dispersed if somebody ever gets aware, i.e., adding one and one together to realize he needs to be called out for yet another malevolent/malignant machination of what we’re made exposed to on Facebook is meant to prevent from surfacing. That is why we don’t all have uniform app experience.
Now you know.
Section 8
When Metaverse comes, it will be aggravating addition to strain on how much already divided to many distractors people’s attention are, including being taken away from giving attention to reading writers’ work too.
Metaverse’s permeation to norma will be more immersion into a new virtual priori that narcissistic attention-seekers will surely gain system of to make everything and everyone else’s clownery about themselves yet again—like those rampantly meaningless but astronomically incentivized cults who resemble being content creators; I am sure that when Meta’s VR vomit has been more broadly unleashed to force us to eat it, it is sure they have already placed similar narcissists as main earners of the platform, that is, corrupt.
Section 9
Mark Zucc, always loving the media to stay relevant, as usual at time skeletons in his closet are stinking out to high heavens he criticized the Chinese Government for tinkering with things while he himself has been tinkering with things too and other things God knows what. He just wanted relevance and clean up his dirty image and foul reputation in this. Though the Chinese maybe doing what he claims they’re doing, more and more people don’t care anymore if he’s saying this and that claim for he had de-legitimized his own image by what evils he has shown he’s “willingly” capable to do.
And in his desperation to push, even extort, to shove to our faces using Metaverse, from what is known and can already be inferred about this doings with Facebook—as with his brand of anti-trust activities and, behind the scenes, his shitty demeanor in person as indicated in his nasty emails that leaked—, we now have some sense and clear idea what his motives in parallel are for Meta’s VR.
Beware of today’s Stalin what he’s up to.
No comments:
Post a Comment