As someone who desires to have a career in writing—perhaps, why you maybe here—or maybe just curious or considering the subject, or wants to learn beyond one’s present style in working on contents to write, learning the craft and way (even greater, as a way of life) of how to one gets a writing done and see the light of day is a lot of times a thoroughly extraordinary process for those who’re deeply committed into the undertaking. And for readers not engaged in the field of writing, this is desires to give perspective on and appreciation of some writer’s point of view on methods of incremental, development process in making content.
This document is meant to cater for specifically to Persons With Disability on education concerning competition in the writing industry, as promised in Portal predicated upon the Core Ethical Philosophies that serve as Constitution for creating publications op-ed and educational media platforms under the UV-Rays* Publication Infrastructure Platform where this content is associated to.
quote goes here.
Some writers’ process of finishing a literary work behind the scenes may be more technical than others. Writers have different—sometimes peculiar—styles in engaging in the undertaking. Writing where what one may only be doing is like writing an essay due to many months or years of constantly having exposure on or active thinking process about a subject is among the easiest undertaking where words come out with ease to transmit the experience, though in starting an experience may be characteristic with having difficulties of comprehending with a circumstance that would need expression to propagate awareness or understanding as regards what one may be going through or undertaking. This is also most especially the case with things or experiences that are already common knowledge; almost everybody can write them like how people maybe just dabbing posting of thoughts or views on in social media, especially with ease when with constant practice, like regularly thinking what extraordinary or differing short content to post on a page.
But for a multi-professional type of writing or writing that covers differing subsets of interests or fields that are not that directly allied to or associated with one another, here is a recommended set of techniques I use in writing, suitable for both beginner and advanced learning, and may be applied as well for improving one’s own writing methods.
Of course not all contents you may see were cast on the same intellectual process that result to an intellectual creation, or for fun. Neither does any single set of methods to produce a literary work are applicable to every need to yield editorial work. But here will be how I approach the endeavor, especially to deal with the need to yield most of my compositions and/or accomplish the results that I desire to work on.
Save in cases when one is in just some respectable ritual of doing some “training” or practice, we do not just write nnnn as a mere obligation, one has gotta have ideas on something to have something to write about, and not just ordinary statements but that which has breadth widened by when kind of views one has does broaden a thought that being posted as a comment isn’t enough to give justice to such perspective (that is, standalone and not just an attachment to another’s nnnn) but deserve it’s own article or journal to be expressed without shortcomings from yielding workable enough to deliver that will provide at least the basic set of information or knowledge and context to be understood, and not misunderstood—when such is prone to such than—just in comment.
When you do have an idea or take on something, e.g., a public sensation, public scene, celebrity commotion, news-worthy stuff, etc., it is advisable to see a additional number of few other’s documentaries or contents dealing with same topic, e.g., watch few videos discussing on the same topic, or read a few from varying sources. That Purpose of which will give you broader perspective about what you are will be writing about, especially in non-in-depth documentary contents one source may not be aware or disclosing an angle, perspective or information that another may know information about. At least before you will be writing your piece you are already oriented on what others are saying about a subject-matter of interest, even find discover misconception that others may have of the subject albeit pessimistic.
An example of this process would be having perspective in something like what a businessperson or consensus of businesspeople (more broader with contrast of mom-and-pop businesses and big enterprises) are saying about leadership or criticism if they have some for example, as compared to workers’ point of view or from a particular socio-economic class, industry, demographic or, even, of level of intelligence.
I advise that in cases when incoming source of inspiration that provide nnnn seems to be lacking, to get ideas what to write, very critical would be to read a technical book (especially those that's are philosophical, perhaps) and along the way eventually you may have insights, realizations or something to say about it and from there you can write something, especially that reading stimulates mental activity. This effect would yield especially when one has been spending long time reading at in a sitting, as, like in topic of this section, reading is an act or habit that is allied to curiosity.
But of course the real practical progress of advancing in each work whatever the topic may be comes upon actually sitting down to work on it and to start writing down—in the strict sense may be more appropriately termed as recording, perhaps, to indicate the purpose—everything that you want expressed in your work. The thing with doing that is you wanna capture into literal literary documentation all your takes and ideas, preferably structured accordingly to concept one has come up with if a creator does have some concept how to develop a specific article.
This isn’t the part stage in the writing process where you are directly going to publish it so just write everything down as well as ideas that occur to you at that moment; better if you insert it an idea in between or on where it will be most appropriate to associate to in the whole composition for properly developing points and arguments, etc. in the contents. Just gather everything you’d need to be associated or is related to what you are writing into an initial body of writing for this will make it easier for you later to edit, rearrange, compress your work to a final draft for release.
Included in what ideas you need recorded as an initial, freestyle literature are those good enough information, notions, expressions, etc. for supporting notions to your work but you suddenly thought of a better way to phrase it or you have in mind omitting or trimming those out after all. Simply put those to be omitted and/or revised with a breakthrough in the source document so you’d have the convenience to just easily skim what to delete in a release duplicate for a final draft copy.
Why to include even these is for purposes of documentation; it’s a good practice to make documentations of developments of your work that will be indicated in words and phrases that are marked with a breakthrough as you pull from stock knowledge, insights and experience, etc. the most appropriate terms and phrases and way of putting your ideas. In fact, many a lot of best-seller novels have such backgrounds we may call that are substance but omitted into published book. That’s part of every great publication of what’s hidden in the inner folds and makes what you see as writing draft openly published but means greater than what volume and collection of words are literally in such books in circulation.
Moreover, another purpose of recording even your initial thoughts what to write may perhaps lead to another story for another day when gathered—may serve to give supporting fragments for cumulatively nnnn one another. You can never tell if eventually those parts that you omitted but still recorded are nevertheless substantial enough for making a starter idea or concept for a next writing, or open up a subset of topics that may need broadening of discussion on.
As an optionally applicable method to consider is color-coded highlighting text that you added in your second draft so that you have that as indication when have you inserted that part. Do it on the spot while you’re editing as it will save time when returning to edit your draft at a later time, with convenience in the ease of not having to do it later only to eat time getting into momentum to recall where have been those later developments in your last editing.
As an optional nnnn color-coded highlighting will also serve as visual indication of when one has edited or inserted a fragment or phrase into the procedural, multiple editing process that a final workable open draft may be produced from. But most handy of all is highlighting text with emphasized formatting like italicized word or phrases, or peculiar or distinguished parts or phrases in a whole article or for other purposes, for convenience of easily spotting such fragments later.
Needless to say, All this set of processes reflect the sacrifices of a writer. How you would do so takes some form of discipline to complete: yes, you’d you do need practice as other publications often preach, then you’re on your own next. But what secret they won’t tell you is the technique that many noble book writers do: writing everything in one sitting, that is, doing a whole writing’s draft in weeks straight and all hours throughout the day spent at being onboard the undertaking (even into problematic stretches like sacrificing sleep) so as to finish a manuscript. By that at least you have a workable manuscript that will be of convenience to produce a final draft for publication from, or submitted forwarded to a publisher for comments, improvements, adjustments to compensate for problems anticipated or seen spotted.
That is so much sacrifice just to be a committed writer. Doing your draft in a stretch of one sitting or in just a few days or weeks only doing it straight to finishing a whole landmark in progress will hold you back from socializing, going with your friends, events, etc. There are a lot of misconceptions related to being a writer. Contrasting are of publishers’ work; to be one you’d need to read an entire manuscript in just a few sittings or you won’t get anywhere. That’s the reality of how it’s really done. Many people think that reading throughout all hours in a whole day or few is a bad thing, maybe from negative beliefs about what reading too much does to one’s mind or thinking, unrealistic superstitious fears diametrically opposite what spending lengthy amount of time reading does to a person.
Get yourself used to lesser social media when unnecessarily problematic to one’s focus especially significant for productivity purposes. Being at peak of the creative process is scarce to obtain or come by, especially in a world of distractions. Once the creative process starts but interrupted a lot of times it’s difficult to get back to. So it is advisable to avoid interruptions (of certain lapse of time) once oneself is at peak of being up the creative process, persevere continuance of being onboard it. This has same underlying psychology as with taking time to focus gaining perspective about a topic by watching videos, listening to podcasts or reading articles or resources dealing with topic or subject-matter of interest back-to-back to eventually come up with ideas related to, or occur or see a different or contrasting aspect or angle compounding in support of one’s idea or position to topic of focus. One’s mind thus operates on in an active thinking process with extra effort of focus on subject than when something one needs to take time to think about is on subconscious process only, likelihood will be such will be rarely to occur vividly or as regard solution thereof flashing in one’s mind.
When writing in what above I can refer to as “just write everything into recorded initial literature,” treat writing each new concept in along the flow of your writing as if they’re their own independent article albeit part of a whole piece and this is especially so that those who maybe jumping to read forward to the middle of your article may be not be lost despite not following through how you developed your points.
More importantly at least for the initial draft, having in mind writing each part sort of like between being not the business of other parts or pointers in the same contents as a unit in relation to focus segment while at the same time crafted partially being related thereto, that is, being such diametric opposites at the same time—for example via referencing other parts or ideas in the article will lighten the burden of inhibiting oneself because of having to heavily consider relating a part to ideas or representations on other parts of the document. But especially still making sure that in the first place inserting or placing a point in between parts where it will be most appropriate for constructive development of the points and between where it’s most associated the most to adjacent points or ideas around would be fundamentally doing developmental arrangement to the whole writing.) The cognitive load of contemplative writing that way for just the initial draft may slow down progress of recording everything that you may include into a topic’s precursor draft. And that does occur during a writer’s undertaking to gather cognitive nnn with the barrier from continuing because one hasn’t incorporated curating a part to adjacent ideas.
Later in editing the precursor can you dedicate time to edit the draft or manuscript to yield a more natural flow of idea development in the contents when in parts where such characteristics are still short on being applying applied. If you heavily consider that during recording process of all ideas you may want to include to make the precursor draft, it may be burden to smoothly writing down want you want to consider including in your writing which is the priority thing to do at this stage in the writing process; it’s a good practice to record your ideas what to include while inspiration thereof is still fresh in your mind. (the sooner, the better) Checks-and-balances to instill other proper literary characteristics of into your writing would be appropriate to heavily focus on after gathering everything you may offer into written work with the exception that you may choose to do so whenever remembering what your ideas are is time or moment you have difficulty recalling so that as you're doing so such thoughts may occur to you again.
Similar to what may happen perhaps when one is that honest to oneself that yourself now in certain occurrences of seeing what some decisions of your past self as naive: When you got your first precursor draft complete, to make sure your writing’s perspective will be suitable to more people with varying states of mind, it is advisable that you do not re-draft your precursor draft immediately but make sure to include as much thoughts you have to say about the topic of the content and new ideas while they’re still fresh in your mind.
Edit your precursor when you’re in a different state of mind than exactly when you’re writing about the topic. You may, for example, move to another article first or read something or go do some other important errands, chores, whereabouts first, or after some days you should be having convenience in time to attend to it again if you’re quite busy. This will make sure that when you’re producing a draft more suitable for release, you’re editing will be closest to as if another person with a contrasting perspective or state of mind is making checks-and-balances at what may be approved in the views of more people and not just the very same state of mind in the exact moment as you have while writing; this will be the closest thing someone working solo on a draft can have next to having an editor or publisher to do the task of constructively scrutinizing your work for you. Some lapse of time on purpose before editing will be a safeguard from cynical fanaticism or auto-narcissism towards viewing competence, greatness, etc. of one’s own writings that may arise from just mere excitement of showing out to the world one’s created content.
Sometimes words may not seem to flow or come out when one is in what’s called a writer’s block. This is especially true with occasions where the topic involves too abstract sets or subsets of principles that are broad, or of relationships, for that requires an extra effort of one’s cognitive capabilities to comprehend things similarly inherent, abstractly uniform among a broad spectrum of objects, entities or intangible things like principles, ideas, concepts; seeing clearly or vividly such occurrence of abstract similarities is hardest the first time.
To circumvent this intellectual crisis in the writing process crisis, previous to time when you’d write down a topic you have difficulty composing, have in mind being contemplative deep about topic you’d write about as you do other things previous to when you’d take time to focus on practically progressing your work.
What will also make it easy to write is do not overstress curating your contents around a given title, just write like a post on social media where you don’t have to think much about the title and you will find ease with continuously coming up with words to put into your, abstractly, post.
Having these things in mind will relieve a writer from cognitive barriers that slow down, even halt, continuance of drafting a manuscript up to workably finished for release; beyond that will of course be editions that are improvements, adjustments or nnnn to version published and in record of source.
It’s a sad truth that people only find something to read where they can use something they came for in reading in the first place. But work that educates on ethical morals are neglected because people aren’t concerned or interested in moral standards.
Reading nowadays has been a cynical process of nnnnn so that oneself may take something one can take or salvage from the writing to boast about, including those who’se only about mediocrity and want secrets how to enter competition where what they only want is doing business especially with recent campaigns on treating a writer’s writing as a business.
That’s the reason why it is known that structure of a written work when extraordinarily unique doesn’t get appreciation for the talent it will take to create such an exceptional structure. This is because people don’t care about how you structure it but only there straight to what information they only came there for to salvage or scrapw from your’s and others because they’re the ones who want credits for the sake of mediocrity to earn more why they wanted to know what to can offer them. This is an utterly disgusting culture of narcissism in the internet.
Amidst struggles and challenges naturally faced by a Person With Disability, being victorious over the social barriers that bar such individual from succeeding in a desired field and become successful in having a writing career may take long.
These are my personal techniques in writing that had developed over time, and that I want my fellow PWDs to be empowered with as an adopted methodology in competing in the writing industry, techniques that many other writers do not disclose, even unaware about.
Please share this resource to other fellow members in the PWD sector, and bookmark this page (on browser you [personally] use) as with the PWD Editors Portal.
Significantly having more PWDs engaged in the writing endeavor of many different interests and fields, and as a source of living as well, while including some advocacy for PWD welfare and interest (subtly, partially or every now and then whenever including such won’t seem inappropriate, nor too far associated to the topic or [associated] ideas adjacent to or surrounding a disability advocacy in the discussion, nor nnn; and do hope that, due to fact that majority, if not most, of experiences shared by members of the community are naturally quite negative or dramatic in nature, that our advocacy be never associated to or sen or perceived or having implications of notoriety, ever), but is still a very much unchartered region of mundane life in the PWD sector which will provide improvement of life-circumstances of members of and prominence to the whole PWD sector until and beyond point when such improvements cannot anymore be undone.
And do hope that we each be successful in this which us underserved part of humanity needs more meaningful role and participation in.
Income For Persons With Disability: PWD Portal
Effective Writing, And It’s Searchability And Monetization That’s Workable
dues p3sri
searchability (countable and uncountable, plural searchabilities) (uncountable, computing) The state of being searchable. (countable, computing) The extent to which, or ease with which something may be searched
Known to the world already on purpose, Meta and owner Mark Zuckerberg who, in truth, is socially awkward, thus, cynical, is yet again on a landmark process of doing his grand plot of pushing yet another “predictably ungodly” digital product to our faces: Metaverse VR. Despite that in these years, he has shown pathologic enjoyment at tricking online users to use his online interfaces for that rabbithole of “caching” our private information and abusing access to it.
But as always, it is, again, not about going out of oneself to serve humanity that, in parallel, is fairly compensated at the same time, but, again, in his reckless efforts just to use us all with state-of-the-art psycho-manipulative tools. And unlike platforms devoted to giving the floor to and giving means of income to certain forms of talents.
“If great people lurk as employees of Facebook, then someone in there should have already thought of including fulfilling features such as profile-blur in public visibility of accounts of PWDs as protected account and indicators of identification thereof, et cetera.”
Come to think of it, Zuckerberg and Facebook had never cared to incentivize writers who keep certain types of users on their platform. He was just all about the media because, among other things he selfishly uses as advantage, he is always about that P.R. endeavor and abusing it. He loves being the media itself and—associated with it—attention to what subtle rabbithole he plots constantly to trick us into relinquishing our data.
One instance of his obsession with public relations to glorify his wrongdoings is when he donated to charities, e.g., $100M Newark, N.J., public schools in 2010 and $500M to Silicon Valley Community Foundation to support health and education causes—which he bragged on post that recorded over 190,000 misguided likes at the time—while he had issue regarding anti-trust competition whistleblowers coming out as well as news coming out that Facebook-owned Instagram had at the time changed it's terms of service that appear to allow the photo-sharing site to put users’ pictures in advertisements.
This goes side-by-side with his ludacris, attention-seeking marketing to hype up some new features to shove to our faces the perception of how great it is and may potentially be (and of course that renown’s credibility is nullified by the kind of reputation Zuckerberg has deep down); why the need to always broadcast and be loud about such things as doing charity? Had he been doing so for a long time already to prove his commitment to humanitarian endeavors? Like how he did psycho-analytic testing on users—comparable to what classic authoritarians would do; in fact like a modern-day Stalin. He wants us all to fall into a state of reductionism of seeing only the present and have blind spots over his foul deeds, motives and intentions. Just compare to such other entities as Google which is quiet on keeping inclusivity. (One example is Google’s portal for disability inclusion.) Unike what Facebook and Zuckerberg’s been up to, they are not shoving it in our faces how humanitarian they are.
Counterpart in ordinary civilians of Mark Zuckerberg and if Facebook/Meta is a natural person would be somebody who’s recklessly striving for relevance despite proving to be untrustworthy and not being ashamed of those well-known facts about him.
These are people who despite continuing to do reckless assaults that alienate other’s rights and security—among other things, our data privacy on his data brokerage auctioning of our profiled identifications, and freedom of speech and of expression on his censorship—though clearly known already but, shamelessly, still wanna rush forward pushing in our faces next big things they’re up to next or at the moments which they hype up or want overrated about themselves on what undertaking resembles something of greatness, that is, if associated with prudent people to whom Zuckerberg doesn’t belong to.
It ain’t easy to be a successful writer.
To begin with, social processes are likely existing in a would-be writer’s life needing expression, and that pushes one to be a writer in the first place. But then such sites as Facebook adds to the struggles by their out-of-touch employees and up their corporate ladder and Zucc himself—social processes exist that serve as social barriers that both accommodates and keeps away certain types of people of certain character types (having to do with immediately perceptible character like being out-of-touch) from gaining a company’s system, i.e., company culture, as a social unit.
Just see backer system inside Facebook as regards what and from whom videos they monetize. That is indicative of what types of people are employed inside Facebook previously and up to present—not being conservative in disabling profiles like some parallel government that is authoritarian. In fact, exponentially more innocent accounts had been being disabled than those really from nefarious actors in the internet; from statistics and record of type of their decision process why on earth more innocent accounts are ones disabled way more than clandestine ones, we can infer what type of people have flocked to be employed at Facebook.
This is reason why it is better that no more accounts, even of bad actors, should anymore be disabled on Facebook; we online users can govern ourselves in truth. If great people lurk as employees of Facebook, then someone in there should have already thought of including fulfilling features such as profile-blur in public visibility of accounts of PWDs as protected account and indicators of identification thereof, et cetera. But instead what we get from Facebook team is being tested psycho-analytically as if they’re psychology or cultural studies researchers following Code of Ethics of the field’s applied principles, e.g., the site being set to hide visibility of certain words like those that incite anger (very effective on people who easily get influenced, why many in public life had shifted over time to be ballistic and extremists than conventional-transitional nature—what Zuckerberg's been up to regarding this classified internal project at Facebook is exactly similar to how Stalin wanted to manipulate Russian population during his time and is the same thing that Stalin would have done if humanity already had social media back then; also why Zuckerberg, Facebook and Meta had been an enterprise that entitled itself to become like some parallel government), and other sinister doings, e.g., selling our data to third-parties. Man, if you are doing such thing, why also be authoritarian in censoring certain stuff on the platform at the same time?
Those two things alone done at the same time notwithstanding his other bossy doings, isn’t that too much already?
Special mention, mind you, is also the fact that on the other hand they monetize pages that are, at best, only spreading videos that fool viewers in what they promise in the title but, by manipulation, only hook the audience for something they either won't deliver at all or poorly yield—and making people brain-dead. What this reflects from pool of content moderators and and their development team and Zucc himself only means being enablers of these blah, their views and interests being a friend of cause of these narcissistic people who’re short on having personality and not standing up for something great but then wants their non-merit monetized!
Think. What type of people could enablers of these narcissistic wannabes be?
Many small thinkers write on the platform and are part of what keeps users on the site—besides mainstream-media for remaining frequenters for updating themselves about news on, still, a lot of demographics.
A site as worse as Facebook has no concern for representing some decent degree of system of merits just play around with programming code, have to maintain the site’s cybersecurity, (gradually) release updates every now and then. And that’s all of it for platforms as worse as Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook and Meta.
It’s easy money just building one thing that anybody can have idea about on what looks good and not because anybody can canvass different websites’ look-and-feel by being online and gain from those then, after developing the platform, would just be maintaining it’s cybersecurity and facility and some incremental updates being just the operations cost while milking the users, but having nothing to do with the actual process of exerting grueling effort of creating content on the platform, while those who doquality contents that keep users in the platform are uncompensated for their work and part in maintaining why users remain on the site.
There are still many who’se legacy are warehoused in it; realistically-speaking, a lot would still be reluctant over deleting of their own data that may be some set of really precious contents that may reflect a lot of or some years of immersing and connecting with others virtually? Therefore, it is recommended that Facebook should just be a mere plug-in and not what now de-legitimized monopoly Mark Zuckerberg continually wants it to be.
He, not certainly still a human, rendered himself's itself (I don’t know how to put more accurately what Zuckerberg certainly is) to only deserve being so. “When Mark Zuckerberg wants something, it sure is certain to be a bad thing.” Indeed.
This protest against Facebook, Meta and Zuckerberg, and recommendation to (online) communities is diametrically opposite of what norms pushed is reflected his algorithm’s inner workings as regards intently punishing of sharing external links by decreasing visibility: he wants people to be stuck and isolated in Facebook as compared to when it’s just used as a plug-in that only supplements participation of laymen in the comments like what other sitar’ been doing.
In relation to section above on anarchic policy of video monetization on Facebook and in argument above on Facebook to be only a plug-in, many sites are better at incorporating means of income from videos than Facebook does with what it has done to dumb down viewers, likewise—and more importantly, as the writers’ sector throughout the world is exponentially undervalued than video content creation, thus needing more attention—many sites are more competent in being receptacles of written content than is Facebook, which only neglects contribution of those who share original thoughts and ideas—whether small, with large following, or only listened to albeit almost having no vocal participation but nevertheless still sought to be read—nor helped by the algorithm, even artificially suppressed.
This is how Mark Zuckerberg is colossally insulting the writing industry and he needs to be stopped; if Steve Jobs was ejected out of his own company, Apple, when corporate health got ugly before, Zuckerberg could and should be too. Only that the former was a virtuous soul while the latter’s stink to high heavens; the former is renowned while you cannot renown the latter for something responsible and virtuous. He’s in truth a modern-day Stalin and Ivan The Terrible.
Mark Zucc already have been extorting us (especially psycho-analytically with internal projects to diabolically tweak the Facebook algorithm) to isolate us into his benevolently curated platform and dumb down people online into mindlessly doodling at scrolls upon scrolls of just algorithm-tampered set of feeds visible to each one of us and mindlessly staring at senseless videos they monetize by choice (also the beta-version upon beta-version push of differing tactics to manipulatively lure us to the site, like the odd notifications on random contents we have no additional time to subscribe to because Zuckerberg’s Facebook has already machinated ways to artificially devour our attention and time to begin with, thus pulling away from writers’ chances of getting their ideas seen, especially with videos and algorithm-selected polarizing feeds that their internally-memo-ed testing had proven to make people hang-out more on Zucc’s site underlying diabolic workings. What other thing does Zuckerberg and Facebook imply in wanting to suggest to us more and more random things to subscribe to from notifications than sending a manipulative message to nnnn; an aimlessly fired barrage of random arrays of what to like, follow or subscribe to in addition to nothing among what you maybe following already to some degree.
Of course, maybe you’d get hooked with what they blow to our faces—and they wish they could bombard us more with. When another additional thing gets you hooked on the platform, additional thing to follow, thus more time kept being obsessed in chasing the errands or whereabouts of yet another additional figure or influencer than such being from organic growth, not alienation on steroids via tweaking the algorithm.
Such notifications and other psycho-analytic devices used by Facebook aren’t made to help the users but to manipulate us, just like how Mark uses linguistic devices to manipulate our impression of him, of Meta and of his upcoming Metaverse by deceptive rhetorics. You may not have encountered such on your notifications, but others are experimented on for it.
That’s the point. Zucc’s Meta wants users having no idea what they’re doing so that speaking out may be dispersed if somebody ever gets aware, i.e., adding one and one together to realize he needs to be called out for yet another malevolent/malignant machination of what we’re made exposed to on Facebook is meant to prevent from surfacing. That is why we don’t all have uniform app experience.
Now you know.
When Metaverse comes, it will be aggravating addition to strain on how much already divided to many distractors people’s attention are, including being taken away from giving attention to reading writers’ work too.
Metaverse’s permeation to norma will be more immersion into a new virtual priori that narcissistic attention-seekers will surely gain system of to make everything and everyone else’s clownery about themselves yet again—like those rampantly meaningless but astronomically incentivized cults who resemble being content creators; I am sure that when Meta’s VR vomit has been more broadly unleashed to force us to eat it, it is sure they have already placed similar narcissists as main earners of the platform, that is, corrupt.
Mark Zucc, always loving the media to stay relevant, as usual at time skeletons in his closet are stinking out to high heavens he criticized the Chinese Government for tinkering with things while he himself has been tinkering with things too and other things God knows what. He just wanted relevance and clean up his dirty image and foul reputation in this. Though the Chinese maybe doing what he claims they’re doing, more and more people don’t care anymore if he’s saying this and that claim for he had de-legitimized his own image by what evils he has shown he’s “willingly” capable to do.
And in his desperation to push, even extort, to shove to our faces using Metaverse, from what is known and can already be inferred about this doings with Facebook—as with his brand of anti-trust activities and, behind the scenes, his shitty demeanor in person as indicated in his nasty emails that leaked—, we now have some sense and clear idea what his motives in parallel are for Meta’s VR.
Beware of today’s Stalin what he’s up to.
